Session #115 · 2017–19

Speech #CREC-2017-10-19-pt1-PgS6593-8_t157

The Santa Ana Refuge is also a popular destination for birders and hosts more than 165,000 visitors each year. The booming ecotourism industry in the area is critical for local economies, which is another key reason why we need to ensure this Refuge and its inhabitants can thrive. U.S Customs and Border Protection and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers planning actions earlier this year suggest that the Trump administration may shift existing Federal Homeland Security funds to construct a segment of-border wall through the Santa Ana Refuge. As I have said before, we already have 650 miles of fencing along our southern border with Mexico in the areas where it is most effective. I am not unequivocally opposed to physical barriers where they are needed and where they can be shown to be the most effective method of border security, but the Santa Ana Refuge is not a known problem area for border crossing. Furthermore, a wall through the Refuge would permanently damage critical habitat, block wildlife migration routes, and would likely trap wildlife during floods. Again, a wall through the refuge would not yield intended outcomes and would harm both wildlife and communities.
Keywords matched
border crossing border wall Border Protection border security

Classification

Sentiment
Negative
Stereotyping
No
Confidence
95%
Model
gemini-2.0-flash
Framing
Legal / procedural Other

Speaker & context

Speaker
THOMAS CARPER
Party
D
Chamber
S
State
DE
Gender
—
Date
2017-10-19
Speech ID
CREC-2017-10-19-pt1-PgS6593-8_t157
Paragraph
#0
← Prev Next →