That clearly was never the intention. It seems to me this is a worthwhile program. It is targeted. It is limited. There is an important need to understand exactly what is happening with many of these students. I support the program. I just wondered If I could ask the Senator a question. In the amendment. it says that students must be making "normal progress" toward a degree in order to keep the visa. Do you agree with letting the universities themselves make a decision about whether the student is in good academic standing or make a reasonable attempt to define that in a reasonable way?