This is particularly true with respect to an issue such as this when everyone involved has more than a suspicion that ultimate outcome would be to prohibit the agricultural issue from being debated and taken up for a vote. This act would constitute a blatant attempt to override the will of a likely majority. I suggest that if such an attempt were made that this would be clear indication that the majority sentiment which supports addressing the needs of agriculture were being intentionally excluded. Otherwise. why would there be a need for such hardball tactics? In short. there is by definition one. and only one. way to move comprehensive immigration reform legislationvote on it. And vote on it now.
Keywords matched
immigration