If the gentleman would yield further. in this very critical area. let us presume in Florida or California you have a 50percent explosion of a certain kind of refugee. You could cut out those elements of immigration programs that provide for education. fundamental training. et cetera. meaning you would have to spread the remaining money across those new numbers and probably undermine the value of those programs to the very citizens who seem to be arriving and are beginning to make a very significant contribution not just to their lives. but to our economy and our society as well. Does the gentleman suggest a freeze should have no flexibility in it? What is the gentleman doing to the fundamental responsibility of the authorizing committee in this case?
Keywords matched
immigration refugee