The exception is that in the first year it could be waived because the State concerned would not have time to develop the longrange plans. The fifth requirement would be: sets forth policies and procedures satisfactory to the Director for approval of applications for assistance under this title and under title VIII submitted by local community action agencies and other qualified applicants. and for the evaluation. review. and monitoring of the program conducted by such applicants (including procedures to assure that such programs conform to the requirements of this Act). The sixth requirement is: sets forth procedures designed to improve the coordination of Stateadministered programs affecting the poor and to achieve at the local level a more effective coordination and concentration of public and private services for disadvantaged individuals and families (including services provided under this Act and under other Federallyassisted programs such as Model Cities. manpower training and development. services for migrant agricultural workers. welfare services. educational assistance for disadvantaged children or adults. health and medical services and benefits. economic development in depressed areas. and agricultural extension services. Let me add here that this is not a requirement that the State economic opportunity office coordinate and actually pull together all these other agencies. but that the other agency programs be taken into consideration. that the representatives of these other agencies serve on the council. This will provide for the best possible coordination within the States of all the activities that are going on to alleviate poverty.