Chicago. 337 U.S. 1. In such a case it is not unusual to ask for reargument (Sherman v. United States. 356 U.S. 369. 379. n. 2. Frankfurter. J.. concurring) even on a constitutional question not raised by the parties. In Abel v. United States. 362 U.S. 217. the petitioner had conceded that an administrative deportation arrest warrant would be valid for its limited purpose even though not supported by a sworn affidavit stating probable cause. but the Court ordered reargument on the question whether the warrant had been validly issued in petitioners case. 362 U.S.. at 219. n.. par. 1. U.S. Sup.
Keywords matched
deportation