Well. if they held it. they would hold it. but I cannot imagine their finding it in view of all the evidence that a state can control its own immigration policy." The postscript to this declaration of faith on the part of the professor should have been that the Commission on Human Rights in formulating the right to travel as it did was violating the precise interdict of article 2. subparagraph 7. Yet this is supposed to be our safeguard against binding judgments of the United Nations bearing on our domestic jurisdiction. Frank E. Holman. past president of the American Bar Association. who has immersed himself in the study of this issue. has given this summary of the work of the United Nations Commission on Human Rights: "Among the many strange and unbelievable results of the deliberations of the Commission on Human Rights. was that. after 400 meetings. a majority refused to include in the convenant on human rights any provision recognizing the basic American right to own private property and be secure in its enjoyment as against its arbitrary seizure by government.
Keywords matched
immigration