Apparently the basis for your criticism is the assumption in the fourth paragraph of your article which you express as follows: "But the purpose of rigid 90percent supports. which the same bill would reestablish. is to encourage maximum production. they were decreed early in World War II to meet swollen wartime demands." - In this opinion which we think is completely out of line with the facts. we believe rests most of the misunderstanding and opposition to the farmsupport program. We think a correct interpretation of the purpose of any support for agriculture is to give agriculture some of the benefits of our protective policy. In other words. it is to compensate agriculture in whole or In part for the burden of overhead that is hung on agricultures shoulders by our protective policy. our minimum wage law. our restricted immigration behind which labor can organize and force its wage scale higher. our time and a half for overtime. our tariffs that protect industry from foreign competition when industry pays that wage scale and extracts from the consuming public its 10. 15. or 20 percent return on the investment. Frankly. we do not feel too critical of the author of this article or of others. even Mr. Fischer. the author of the now famous.
Keywords matched
immigration