Session #71 · 1929–31

Speech #710019985

Without objection. it Is so ordered. The table is as follows: Table 8hering a reapportionment of 435 Representatives in 0ongress on the basis of the total population as compared toitf a reapportionment based on the population exclusive of the foreign born who have not become naturalized. It is based on the census of 1920 and the method of major fr.actions was vsed Reapportionment on basis ofTotal Present populaState member- tion exship Total eluding popula- aliens tion (unnaturalized foreign born) Total ----------------------------------------- 435 435 435 Alabma ------------------------------------------- 10 10 10 Arizona.: ------------------------------------------- 1 1 1 Arkansas .. . ..--------------------------------------- 7 7 8 California ------------------------------------------ 11 14 13 Colorado ------ ------------------------------------- 4 4 4 Connecticut ---------------------------------------- 5 6 5 Delaware ------------------------------------------- 1 1 1 Florida --------------------------------------------- 4 4 4 Georgia -------------------------------------- 12 12 13 Idaho --------------------------------------------- 2 2 2 Illinois -------------------------------------------- 27 27 27 Indiana --------------------------------------------- 13 12 13 Iowa . . ..---------.--------------------------------- 11 10 10 Kansas ---------------------------------------- 8 7 8 Kentucky ------------------------------------- 11 10 11 Louisiana ---------------------------------.......... 8 7 8 Maine ---------------------------------------------- 4 3 3 Maryland ------------------------------------------ 6 6 6 IMassachusetts ------------------------------------- 16 16 14 Michigan ------------------------------------------- 13 15 15 Minnesota ------------------------------------------ 10 10 10 Mississippi ----------------------------------------- 8 7 8 Missouri ----------------------------------------- 16 14 15 Montana ------------------------------------------- 2 2 2 Nebraska ------------------------------------------ 6 5 6 Nevada ....------------------------------------- --- -- 1 1 1 New Hampshire ----------------------------------- 2 2 2 New Jersey ----------------------------------------- 12 13 12 New Mexico ---------------------------------------- 1 1 1 New York ------------------------------------------ 43 43 39 North Carolina -----------------------_------- - 10 11 11 North Dakota --------------------------------------- 3 3 3. Ohio -------------------------------------------- 22 24 24 Oklahoma ------------------------------------------ 8 8 9 Oregon -------------------------------------------- 3 3 3 Pennsylvania --------------------------------------- 36 36 35 Rhode Island --------------------------------------- 3 2 2 South Carolina ---------------------- ------------ 7 7 South Dakota ------------------------------------- 3 3 1 Tennessee ------------------------------------------ 10 10 10 Texas ----------------------------------------------- 18 19 19 Utah ----------------------------------------------- 2 2 2 Vermont -------------------------------------------- 2 1 1 Virginia -------------------------------------------- 10 10 10 Washington -------------------------------------- 5 6 6 West Virginia -------------------------------------- 6 6 6 Wisconsin ------------------------------------------ 11 11 11 Wyoming --------------------------------------- 1 1
Keywords matched
foreign born naturalized

Classification

Target group
Sentiment
Neutral
Stereotyping
No
Confidence
95%
Model
gemini-2.0-flash
Framing
Legal / procedural

Speaker & context

Speaker
Unknown
Party
Chamber
State
Gender
Date
Speech ID
710019985
Paragraph
#0
← Prev Next →