However. I would have them brought before a specially trained court. where they may properly present and have considered their problems of administration. and before a national. not a local. court. I should say in this connection that the bill proposes no change in the present procedure of the United States district courts to grant writs of habeas corpus to review the decisions of the Deipartment of Labor in immigration cases. nor of the threejudge courts to review orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission and orders of the Secretary of Agriculture under the packers and stockyards act. nor of the circuit courts of appeal to review ceaseanddesist orders of the Federal Trade Commission. nor of the district courts to review the matter of permits under the prohibition laws. At the present time it is customary for officers of the Federal Government brought into the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia to answer petitions for mandamus or injunctions by attorneys of their department or establishment. either nominally or actively assisted by the United States attorney for the District of Columbia. Not infrequently attorneys from such departments nnd establishnents assist in representing the United States in other courts.
Keywords matched
immigration