One side prevailed at one stage and carried its proposition. but not by a pronounced majority showing a great voice of the body. and in an hour it was changed by the appearance or absence of members of the Senate. So does not the Senator recognize that upon that distinct proposition there is recorded no pronounced decided majority vote of the Senate? And there are other amendments where one side prevailed and then another side prevailed. But it is not a case like that of the immigration bill. where an entire bill was substituted for the committees bill and adopted by the Senate without regard to divers issues upon other propositions. The Senate made another bill and decided it upon one vote. Does not the Senator see a very grave distinction in this case?
Keywords matched
immigration