Perhaps I had better state my questions and then sit down. that the Senator may answer both. The second question is whether. under lines 26 to 31. near the close of the fourth page. the Senator understa nds that the privilege of habeas corpus is denied to persons imprisoned by the United States marshal under a real or alleged order of deportation. and. if it be not denied. whether the provision that the person shall not be admitted to bail. but shall remain in custody. changes the existing practice on habeas corpus. which permits the court in its discretion to admit the applicant to be bailed pending the habeas corpus proceedings. which in this case might possibly be delayed for a long time. that is. there might be a petition to the circuit court of the United Stites. and an appeal or other process which would remove the question to the Supreme Court of the United States2 Now. my question is whether the Senator does not think that here is a denial to persons alleged to be Chinese persons. because of an order of deportation. of the right to have the question of habeas corpus dealt with. they being at large and their return secured by bail if the court. in its discretion. so orders? Those are the two questions.
Keywords matched
deportation