That was disbursed for the general purposes of the tribe. but not that which was disbursed for the support of the refugees. Now. why not indemnify itself also for that ? The statement in this report is: The diversion of this fand to the amount of Q176.755.97 by the Indian Bureau. between 1862 and 1oeM. to the benefit.of the loyal refugees of the Creek iato. was one that has not been ratified by the Creek latien by its subsequent treaties. That is all. It has not ratified it. but in the restoration of this orphan fund why should the United States make good their disbursements that were made on account of a portion of the tribe ?
Keywords matched
refugees