Not the slightest. The principle is this: There must be an end . the Senator from Connecticut does not want it ended until it is ended right. and the case put by the Senator from Vermont is a perfect answer to the Senator. The first year we decide that the man is a citizen and admit him. the next year proof comes which everybody its the United States then believes to show that that man had come over the month before. and had not even been naturalized. The Senator says if we are all satisfied. if it turns out beyond all question that this man had never been a citizen. why should we not reverse our action. and why should it not be the law that we may reverse our action ? I can answer that easily. so easily. when yon consider what the law is. that there cannot be a doubt about it.
Keywords matched
naturalized