Session #115 · 2017–19

Speech #CREC-2018-01-18-pt1-PgS283_t5

We knew there were differences we needed to bridge. We agreed to four different pillars that we would use as a basis for negotiation. Come up with something that the DACA population needs, something compassionate--something very similar or maybe something between the bill that Senator Lankford, Senator Hatch, and I proposed, the SUCCEED Act and the Dream Act--and bridge the differences. We were making progress. We also knew that we had to deal with things like the diversity lottery, border security, and what some of our colleagues call family reunification, which has been abused and needs to be fixed. Others call it chain migration. At the end of that meeting, we agreed that what we needed to do was to have the leaders, the whips of the House and the Senate--the Democrats and the Republicans--agree to a timeline and a schedule and then get together and work out our differences. I, for one, think those meetings should be open to the public because then the public would realize, I think, that we are not that far apart.
Keywords matched
border security chain migration DACA family reunification

Classification

Sentiment
Neutral
Stereotyping
No
Confidence
90%
Model
gemini-2.0-flash
Framing
Legal / procedural

Speaker & context

Speaker
THOM TILLIS
Party
R
Chamber
S
State
NC
Gender
—
Date
2018-01-18
Speech ID
CREC-2018-01-18-pt1-PgS283_t5
Paragraph
#7
← Prev Next →