Madam President, I thank Chairman Grassley for his
leadership on this issue and for offering the SECURE Act, which I and
some of the other Senators have supported. I wish to continue this debate where Senator Tillis left off. We have
heard a lot today about the so-called DACA Program, Deferred Action for
Childhood Arrivals, and the negotiations in which we are currently
engaged. Hopefully, those negotiations will reach a solution that will
satisfy all the parties and give certain legal protections to the DACA
population. We have heard a lot today about border security and the wall. I want
to focus on one other element of a needed, negotiated solution, and
that is chain migration--putting an end, once and for all, to chain
migration. When you give legal status to an illegal immigrant, that is
a permanent change in law; it will never be reversed. Therefore, you
can't simply accept some window dressing at the border--1 year of
funding for demonstration or pilot projects. You have to have a
permanent change in return for a permanent change, and an end to chain
migration will be one of the most important permanent changes to U.S.
immigration law in 52 years. What is chain migration? Under the current law, which dates back to
1965, if you are a citizen, you can bring any one of your relatives to
this country, not just your spouse and your unmarried minor kids--your
nuclear family--but also your adult kids and their spouses and their
children and your adult brother and your adult sister and your parents
and then their siblings and so on and so forth. That is why it is
called chain migration. Each person is a potential link in a never-
ending chain. The vast majority of people who immigrate to our country
legally every single year do so for the sole reason that they just
happen to be related to someone who is already here. We have heard a lot of talk about the American dream in recent days--
that we are a nation of immigrants; it is part of our core, and that is
absolutely right. We are a nation of immigrants. We are a nation where
blood ties are not supposed to dictate the path of your life, where you
can fulfill your dreams. But we have an immigration system that does
the exact opposite--an immigration system that favors the ties of
blood, the ties of kinship, the ties of clan, and the ties of tribe. What could be less American than that? As a result, we have also had a massive wave of low-skilled and
unskilled immigrants, over the last 52 years. Today, of the million-
plus immigrants who come here every year, only 1 in 15 comes here
because of education, job skills, or a job offer. That means we have
thousands and thousands of workers, with absolutely no consideration
for what it means for the workers who are already here--the workers who
are American citizens, who are earning a wage. In many cases, the most
recent immigrants are going to face competition from the next wave of
unskilled immigrants, so we are putting downward pressure on their
wages--the wages of people who work with their hands and work on their
feet, who hold the kinds of jobs that require you to take a shower
after you get off work, not before you go to work. Blue-collar workers have begun to see an increase in their wages over
the last year for the first time in decades, and that is in no small
part because of the administration's efforts to get immigration under
control. But it is not enough to stop there. The real question is, who should our immigration system work for? It
should work for the American people, the American worker. It should be
crafted for their benefit, not for the benefit of foreigners. We should
have an immigration system that fulfills the needs of our economy, that
focuses on jobs and wages for American citizens here, whether your
parents came over on the Mayflower or whether you just took the oath of
citizenship last week. This is not some radical position. Liberal
Democrats used to believe in that. I understand that in this debate most of the attention is focused on
the population of about 690,000 illegal immigrants who came here,
through no fault of their own, as young children 15, 20, 30 years ago. I think the concern for them is very understandable. President Trump
has shown it.
Keywords matched
immigration chain
migration illegal immigrants DACA immigrants immigrate illegal immigrant chain migration border security