Session #115 · 2017–19

Speech #CREC-2017-07-26-pt1-PgH6313-6_t39

But almost all of these areas already have high fences, because of the hundreds of miles of building that followed the Secure Fence Act of 2006. In emptier areas, reducing a border crosser's head start by 10 to 15 minutes is hardly a deterrent--and in Texas, the Rio Grande already serves that purpose. The border wall would be dangerous More wall-building could have tragic consequences. Violence, poverty, and family ties ensure that migrants will continue attempting the risky journey through the border region's inhospitable wilderness zones. Every year, U.S. authorities find the remains of hundreds of migrants, dead of dehydration and exposure in deserts and scrublands. With more fencing, migrants may attempt the crossing in even more remote areas, where the probability of death will be even higher. The border wall would be divisive Building a wall sends a toxic message to one of our two closest neighbors, a country on whose cooperation the United States' national security and economic prosperity depends. Mexico is the United States' third-largest trading partner. Our common border is 1,970 miles long.
Keywords matched
border wall migrants

Classification

Sentiment
Negative
Stereotyping
No
Confidence
95%
Model
gemini-2.0-flash
Framing
Security threat Humanitarian

Speaker & context

Speaker
JAMES MCGOVERN
Party
D
Chamber
H
State
MA
Gender
—
Date
2017-07-26
Speech ID
CREC-2017-07-26-pt1-PgH6313-6_t39
Paragraph
#1
← Prev Next →