Session #115 · 2017–19

Speech #CREC-2017-04-26-pt1-PgH2887-2_t1

Speaker, I would inject that it appears that Judge Orrick and leaders in San Francisco must be deeply in need of a safe space where they can go sit in the dark, suck their thumbs, hold their blankets, and feel comforted somehow because of the illusions that they have generated of all these bugaboos that are threatening in their wild imaginations. Mr. McCarthy goes on: ``Sanctuary cities? Maybe we should call them snowflake cities. ``As noted above, there is a transparent agenda behind Orrick's sleight of hand. The judge is keen to warn the President that, if ever his administration were to deny funds to sanctuary cities, it would violate the Constitution. It is in connection with this advisory opinion that the judge makes the only point worthy of consideration-- albeit not in the case before him. ``Here, it is useful to recall the Supreme Court's first ObamaCare ruling. While conservatives inveighed against Chief Justice Roberts' upholding of the individual mandate, the decision had a silver lining: The majority invalidated ObamaCare's Medicaid mandate, which required the States, as a condition of qualifying for Federal Medicaid funding, to enforce the Federal Government's generous new Medicaid qualifications. ``In our system, the States are sovereign--the Federal Government may not dictate to them in areas of traditional State regulation, nor may it conscript them to enforce Federal law.
Keywords matched
sanctuary cities Sanctuary cities

Classification

Target group
Sentiment
Negative
Stereotyping
No
Confidence
100%
Model
gemini-2.0-flash
Framing
Legal / procedural

Speaker & context

Speaker
LOUIE GOHMERT
Party
R
Chamber
H
State
TX
Gender
—
Date
2017-04-26
Speech ID
CREC-2017-04-26-pt1-PgH2887-2_t1
Paragraph
#4
← Prev Next →