Session #115 · 2017–19

Speech #CREC-2017-02-14-pt1-PgS1149-2_t22

The nominee's record makes clear that he is an independent and fairminded judge who is deeply committed to the separation of powers. Here is just one example from his many opinions on this point. Just last year, Judge Gorsuch had to decide a case about the authority of the Board of Immigration Appeals, or the BIA, which answers to the Attorney General. The BIA wanted to change the Attorney General's power to waive immigration requirements for illegal immigrants, and it wanted the new rules to apply to undocumented immigrants whose waiver applications were already in the works. The nominee said no to this executive agency. To be clear, Judge Gorsuch was asked to decide whether an executive agency in charge of immigration laws could change the law on a whim in a way that many believed was unfair to immigrants who had already sought waivers. He said no. With due respect to my friend the minority leader, there is no doubt that Judge Gorsuch would say no to this or any other part of the executive branch that oversteps its bounds.
Keywords matched
immigration illegal immigrants undocumented immigrants Immigration

Classification

Sentiment
Neutral
Stereotyping
No
Confidence
90%
Model
gemini-2.0-flash
Framing
Legal / procedural

Speaker & context

Speaker
CHARLES GRASSLEY
Party
R
Chamber
S
State
IA
Gender
Date
2017-02-14
Speech ID
CREC-2017-02-14-pt1-PgS1149-2_t22
Paragraph
#0
← Prev Next →