Session #115 · 2017–19

Speech #CREC-2017-02-07-pt1-PgH1064_t1

I lament that that decision was made in 1986 by President Reagan to sign the Amnesty Act because it started us on a 30-year debate. Once debate was out there and once the public understood and once people in foreign countries began to believe that if they could, once, get into the United States, there would sooner or later come along and be another Amnesty Act that would include them and they would have their path to citizenship and lawful presence in America and all of the benefits that have grown massively since 1986, once you put the carrot out, once you break the mold of the principle of protecting the rule of law, then after that it is easier the next time and the next time and the next time. Our virtue that we had a respectable virtue on enforcing immigration law in `86 has been ratcheted downwards because of the `86 Amnesty Act and at least six much smaller but subsequent amnesty acts since that time. I looked into the language in the early part of this millennium more than a decade ago, and they say, well, first of all, it is not amnesty, and they tried to redefine it. I have had this discussion with Karl Rove during the George W.
Keywords matched
immigration

Classification

Target group
Sentiment
Negative
Stereotyping
No
Confidence
95%
Model
gemini-2.0-flash
Framing
Legal / procedural

Speaker & context

Speaker
STEVE KING
Party
R
Chamber
H
State
IA
Gender
Date
2017-02-07
Speech ID
CREC-2017-02-07-pt1-PgH1064_t1
Paragraph
#6
← Prev Next →