Session #115 · 2017–19

Speech #CREC-2017-02-07-pt1-PgH1064_t1

I would call that a 25 percent efficiency rate. Then I go down to the border and I talk to the officers and the agents down there. This includes Border Patrol and ICE. I ask: So you are stopping about 25 percent? Their answer that comes back to me as the most consistent is: No. Ten percent has to come first. I have had estimates by ICE officers who operate near the border who will say they think it is closer to 2 to 3 percent. Now, I don't know that that is the right number, and I don't want to assert here, Mr. Speaker, into this Record that I think we are only stopping 2 to 3 percent of those who attempt to get across the border. I am suggesting that that is certainly a number that is plausible. It comes from the people who should know the most, and if the Border Patrol on the border says 10 percent has to come first, they might be thinking that 2 to 3 percent sounds all right. I am not even focused on those numbers of 2 to 3, up to 10 percent. I will take it to a 25 percent number and say that could be an inflated number, but it is still an awful number to consider for return on investment if you are going to spend $13.4 billion a year every single year and get 25 percent efficiency on $6.7 million a mile.
Keywords matched
ICE officers Border Patrol

Classification

Sentiment
Negative
Stereotyping
No
Confidence
95%
Model
gemini-2.0-flash
Framing
Legal / procedural Economic threat

Speaker & context

Speaker
STEVE KING
Party
R
Chamber
H
State
IA
Gender
Date
2017-02-07
Speech ID
CREC-2017-02-07-pt1-PgH1064_t1
Paragraph
#15
← Prev Next →