It would have produced a more thoughtful piece of
legislation. Yet, we are not even allowed to have that debate on the
floor of the House, which is why this rule is wrong and why I stand in
strong opposition to it. We should be considering legislation to create permanent, high-paying
jobs, investing in infrastructure to grow our communities, fixing our
broken immigration system, and streamlining and improving our tax
system through tax reform rather than recycling old bills
that 56 Members have not even had the opportunity to put their imprint
on. I urge my colleagues to vote ``no'' on the rule for those very
reasons. Mr.
Keywords matched
immigration