Session #114 · 2015–17

Speech #1140082653

Speaker. I rise in strong opposition to this resolution. I say to my friends across the aisle. who are so passionate about Congress having a role in this case: where was that enthusiasm when Congress had ample opportunity to prevent this case by doing its job and enacting real. bipartisan comprehensive immigration reform? The only reason this case exists is that Congress did not do its job. and then President Obama had no choice but to act in the limited capacity that he could under the law. He acted within his legal authoritysomething I am confident the Court will affirm. He acted because it would have been inhumane not to do anything while families were being torn apart by our broken immigration policies and this Congress failure to act. The Democraticcontrolled Senate passed a comprehensive immigration reform bill in June of 2013. and House Republicans did nothing for more than 500 days before President Obama resorted to the power of his pen. Now to authorize the Speaker to file an amicus brief opposing the Presidents actions rather than acting through the office known as the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group is a break from the usual procedure by which the House weighs in on a matter before the courts in which it may have an interest.
Keywords matched
immigration

Classification

Target group
Sentiment
Neutral
Stereotyping
No
Confidence
95%
Model
gemini-2.0-flash
Framing
Legal / procedural Humanitarian

Speaker & context

Speaker
STENY HOYER
Party
D
Chamber
H
State
MD
Gender
M
Date
2016-03-17
Speech ID
1140082653
Paragraph
#0
← Prev Next →