They have a duty to respond consistently with the integrity of the United States of America. We all know that. In this case. the government lawyers asserted that: No applications for the revised DACA would be accepted until the 18th of February. and that no action would be taken on any of those applications until March the 4th. Regarding this. Judge Hanen said: This representation was made even as the Government was in the process of granting over 100.000 threeyear renewals under the revised DACA. It goes on: In response to this representation. counsel for the States agreed to a schedule more favorable to the Government. and the Court granted the Governments request not only to file a surreply. but also to have additional time to do so. The States now argue that they would have sought a temporary restraining order. but for the Governments misrepresentations.