Session #114 · 2015–17

Speech #1140007634

This is not about debating the weeds over this bill versus that bill. There are two distinct differences. The House bill has the funding for fiscal year 2015 in it that would take care of every single agency under the Department of Homeland Security to defend and protect the Nation. but at the same time it is loaded with five immigration riders that we call poison pill riders because the President said if legislation to fund Homeland Security passes with these five immigration riders. he will veto the bill. The President wants to fund an appropriations bill. and so do I. The House Homeland Security bill. if taken up by the Senate. would simply be a delaying tactic. We would talk. we would debate. we would offer lots of amendments on immigration. and after we got lots of amendments on immigration it might go to the President. The President would veto it. and it would come back. and after all is said and done. more would get said than gets done. We have to pass the funding for the protecting of the homeland.
Keywords matched
immigration

Classification

Target group
Sentiment
Neutral
Stereotyping
No
Confidence
100%
Model
gemini-2.0-flash
Framing
Legal / procedural

Speaker & context

Speaker
BARBARA MIKULSKI
Party
D
Chamber
S
State
MD
Gender
F
Date
2015-02-04
Speech ID
1140007634
Paragraph
#0
← Prev Next →