The rule here even abrogates the House rule that requires half the time be provided to the opposition. by saying it will be controlled by two people who both support the bill. Again. why is there such a push to avoid fairness in consideration and debate on this bill? "We need a comprehensive bill" is language we have heard over and over. What struck me was. gee. thats what we heard about the immigration debate: we need a comprehensive bill. Why was that said about immigration? I submit it was said because there were things that people wanted to hide in a comprehensive bill that could never pass on its own. So I begin to look at this bill. and it appears to have the same problem.
Keywords matched
immigration