The administration has looked at this and has seen that the program in place that we are talking about now has been in place since 1970 as a demonstration project. "Demonstration." the word itself connotes the fact that this is temporary in nature. Since that time. we have the VR program. which I pointed out earlier. maybe the gentleman did not hear my testimony. the VR program handles these same services. In fact. it says: "The activities needed to successfully serve the migrant and seasonal farmwork population do not differ from those that benefit a much wider group of VR consumers." For example. the outreach activities in churches and community centers may be effective for identifying farmworkers with disabilities. what this amendment deals with. but they also assist in identifying other persons with disabilities who visit these places. The hiring of bilingual counselors will assist all consumers who are monolingual in a nonEnglish language. whether they are farmworkers or not. And the provisions of the transportation services for rural areas will benefit all rural residents. whether farmworkers or not. The bottom line is. our basic premise is. if you are going to serve a segment of the population. in this case individuals with disabilities and migrant farmworkers. lets do so. but lets do so with programs that are already up and running and have a track record. That is what this underlying bill does. It even does it with spending $36 million more.