Session #110 · 2007–09

Speech #1100058994

I believe we have acted in a bipartisan way. But just to indicate a few differences between what is in this bill and what we have done in the past on a bipartisan basis or coming out of the Homeland Security Committee. the chemical protection regime that we established last year. after much discussion. after much debate and after much balancing is changed in this bill. The border fence. which has been the subject of much debate. much attention. I happen to support it and proudly support it. I do not believe it is the panacea. but it is part of the solution. Many in the American public have wondered whether we meant what we said when we passed the legislation that authorized and appropriated funds for the border fence. They must have many more questions today. because in this bill it makes it more difficult to complete that task. Some would suggest it makes it impossible.
Keywords matched
border fence

Classification

Target group
None Specific
Sentiment
Neutral
Stereotyping
No
Confidence
65%
Model
gemini-2.0-flash
Framing
Legal / procedural

Speaker & context

Speaker
DANIEL LUNGREN
Party
R
Chamber
H
State
CA
Gender
M
Date
2007-06-15
Speech ID
1100058994
Paragraph
#0
← Prev Next →