President. very briefly. to respond to my good friend from New Mexico about some of his concerns. this is not about me feeling good. this is about having the law work in a way that will deter people from crossing our borders illegally. I Point to the Angel Resendez case. and if we had this law in effect where we had mandatory jail time for those who had committed offenses and caught on our soil. In a 10year period he committed five crimes. got deported each time. and was able to come back and commit another crime. If this amendment had been in place. he would have been in jail for a longer period of time and maybe his murder victims would be alive today. This is a case not about me feeling good. it is about somebody with a great propensity to cross our border illegally and commit crimes and not being held accountable in a serious way. After the Booker case. the sentencing guidelines are advisory. If we want to send a message that we are flexible when it comes to immigration law violations. we are doing a great job of it. People must believe we are flexible. because they are coming across our borders in droves. Flexibility is being taken as indifference. What we need to do is to make it a crime that will sting people when they come across. The cost to this country of having laws that are ignored and are virtually a joke is huge. Look at where we are today with illegal immigration. Lets try something new. Lets try doing something that has worked over time: If you commit a crime. you do some time.
Identified stereotypes
Generalizing that those who cross the border illegally have a "great propensity to commit crimes"