Session #110 · 2007–09

Speech #1100041426

Well. making it worse. of course. as we know. the supervisors. who were actually threatened by the U.S. attorneys. the prosecutors in this case. were threatened that if they did not testify against Ramos and Compeon. and claimed that. in fact. there was an attempt to cover up this incident. rather than just being a case of where they were trying not to have to put themselves in a position where they were going to have to do all this more paperwork. they threatened the supervisors to put them in jail. Of course. the supervisors buckled. They didnt want their lives to be destroyed. Well. let me put it this way. What we have got here. failure to report. to file a report. is a procedural violation. It is not a crime. This U.S. Attorney chose to go after the Border Patrol agents instead of the drug dealer. He chose to make a procedural violation into a crime. into a felony. Again. threats were made against the supervisors. so what do you have there?
Keywords matched
Border Patrol

Classification

Target group
Sentiment
Negative
Stereotyping
No
Confidence
100%
Model
gemini-2.0-flash
Framing
Criminal Security threat

Speaker & context

Speaker
DANA ROHRABACHER
Party
R
Chamber
H
State
CA
Gender
M
Date
2007-05-03
Speech ID
1100041426
Paragraph
#4
← Prev Next →