Session #109 · 2005–07

Speech #1090127954

Lastly. the bill more than doubles present funding for the successful port security grant program to $400 million At the current rate of funding. securing the physical infrastructure of our ports would take decades to complete. Despite these and other important provisions. I continue to be disappointed that the rule for this bill did not allow consideration of amendments by my Democratic colleagues that would have further enhanced the protecton of our ports and our economy. For example. the Thompson Amendment would have added 1600 new Customs and Border Protection officers at our Nations ports. Having adequate staff to inspect incoming cargo is a basic first step toward securing incoming cargo. Additionally. the Langevin Amendment would have accelerated the installation of radiation detection monitors at our seaports.
Keywords matched
Border Protection

Classification

Target group
None Specific
Sentiment
Neutral
Stereotyping
No
Confidence
80%
Model
gemini-2.0-flash
Framing
Legal / procedural Economic contributor Security threat

Speaker & context

Speaker
LUCILLE ROYBAL-ALLARD
Party
D
Chamber
H
State
CA
Gender
F
Date
2006-05-03
Speech ID
1090127954
Paragraph
#0
← Prev Next →