Session #109 · 2005–07

Speech #1090123831

Both provide for long overdue law enforcement communications upgrades. Senator GREGG and I have worked on these matters since the tragic Drega incidents that affected our States demonstrated this critical need. Both amendments contain funding for border patrol vehicles and surveillance technology. Years ago it was a Vermont agent who helped develop remote sensors for border patrol purposes. Both contain almost $800 million for helicopter replacement and other air patrol and surveillance needs. Both contain $600 million for the Coast Guard vessels. aircraft. and equipment that is needed. Some of the other inclusions are less essential but I will not quibble with the subcommittee chairman or the Democratic leader who both include the same items and dollar amounts. The difference between the amendments is a significant one. however. as the Democratic leader has explained. He supports. we all support. increased border security. But his amendment ensures that these additions are not paid for by taking funds from the emergency funding recommended for the needs of troops fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan or from the needs of those victimized by Hurricane Katrina in the gulf region. We should not be cutting pay and benefits for our National Guard.
Keywords matched
border security border patrol

Classification

Target group
Sentiment
Neutral
Stereotyping
No
Confidence
90%
Model
gemini-2.0-flash
Framing
Legal / procedural Security threat

Speaker & context

Speaker
PATRICK LEAHY
Party
D
Chamber
S
State
VT
Gender
M
Date
2006-04-25
Speech ID
1090123831
Paragraph
#3
← Prev Next →