He also never stated whether he personally agrees with the decision in Franklin v. Gwinnett. where the Supreme Court unanimously rejected his argument that title IX. the landmark law against gender discrimination. provided no monetary relief to a schoolgirl who was sexually abused by her schoolteacher. A careful reading of the transcript of his testimony makes clear that he never embraced the Supreme Courts decision to uphold affirmative action at the University of Michigan Law School. nor did he expressly agree with the Supreme Court decision that all childrenincluding those who are undocumentedhave a legal right to public education. He emphasized his agreement with certain rationales used by the court in those cases. but he left himself a lot of wiggle room for future reconsideration of those 54 decisions. Finally. a number of my colleagues on the committee asked Judge Roberts about issues related to womens rights and a womans right to privacy.
Keywords matched
undocumentedhave