But what about having science by sex? What about English proficiency and social economic for reading? Because. in fact. the subcategories. that would be useful information and really is information that is useful in English proficiency if we do not know the differences by whether they are a current migrant or whether they. in other words. we start to multiply the variations in what is already there. All of this is important data. Are we going to data the districts to death? Furthermore. in addition in this subsection 4(a)(A) it says that there has to be assessment instruments in performance objectives for every subgroup that is disaggregated. So that means. for example. if we have female and male Macedonian American students by income. unless they come in the current migrant status. then we would have to have them in a different subgroup. and then we say this is giving schools flexibility for this ittybitty. tiny flexibility that we are seeking here. This is a massive potential even without my proposed additional information. This is a potential massive paperwork problem. and I urge that we reject this amendment. but we in effect gut EdFlex.