I iagine that. kind of treatment ats only oceurrlng at tLe hands of the persecutOts It the vOy countries from which these refuigees flee. Finally. I am eonairtIea about. the con.isiency witI which INS Implenents lis oiwn rules and regulations In etonlIlitlnce with the 1996 immigration law. For example. In tite General Altcounating Offices report thai was sent. to ole yesterday. the tAO destlaieh Inconsistencles itotg 1int eight abyluin offices in tle pro:tiss of .onductiang "cirediltle lilr interviews. Soic offles fatile lu Idulatuant whether at retiulrd litagraplli oal torture was read to the asylur seeker. or whether qaaeltions about toruire were aklitt. i itami concerned about thiose lanolslsl.encles -especially slnct Inlirmthtion about torture would provide at solid lisss till whi:h to gant asylum. INS should also he conslistel.t in tLllowing for eflective rempresentatiUn when ii iasyumllt appliclant appears beforie an Immigral tll judgte. This ieans that. tnigratiihn judges should allow the attorney or representative of tite asylum secker to participate at the hearing by speaking or askinr qiuestlions. llae right. tI have a trained asylumn officer ear an asylum clain or to have couiel speak duling a review iearing before an Immigration ludge slitil ha a consistent right of all asylutil selkersnot just 1 rig lht. Ilit thpelanis on which airpori. a poason lands In or which lintnigattion Judge that person attids upf alpeillig to. In conclusion.
Keywords matched
Immigration Immigral immigration