Session #103 · 1993–95

Speech #1030136312

So if the public is listening or if the public who are reading the transcript will understand. that is where it is really at. This whole argument about whether it Is funded or not funded is kind of a vehicle to oppose the substance of the amendment. The substance we are talking about is an attempt to get control of a flood of illegal aliens who are coming into our country and basically taking resources that they. as illegal aliens from whatever country they come from. should not be entitled to because we do not have enough money to provide medical care and education and housing benefits and all the other benefits for everyone in the world who can get here illegally. I have been in favor of legal immigration. I voted for the last immigration bill. which was a very substantial and positive bill. and I am in favor of legal immigration. But if we just say that anyone who comes here illegally can get the same benefits package and is indeed entitled to the same benefits package as Americans. we are condemning our own people. our seniors. and our younger people. to basically a breakdown in the social services and a breakdown in their educational system. I know that people are trying to say that those of us on this side are in some way mean spirited. or at least they imply it.
Identified stereotypes
Illegal aliens from whatever country they come from are taking resources.
Keywords matched
illegal aliens immigration

Classification

Sentiment
Negative
Stereotyping
⚠️ Yes
Confidence
90%
Model
gemini-2.0-flash
Framing
Economic threat Legal / procedural

Speaker & context

Speaker
DANA ROHRABACHER
Party
R
Chamber
H
State
CA
Gender
M
Date
1994-02-24
Speech ID
1030136312
Paragraph
#0
← Prev Next →