I am one Member that would like to know who is on first and what is on second. A couple of weeks ago our new Commissioner of INS was quoted in the Washington Post. Let me read: Over the past year she has repeatedly argued that even if NAFTA meets its goals of promoting economic development In Mexico. it could actually increase the flow of illegal immigration for up to 20 years. This morning in the Washington Post the President of the United States. the gentleman who appointed her Commissioner on INS. was quoted as saying if NAFTA is rejected it "would result in a flood of illegal immigrants." Further. if rejected. "The trade agreement would encourage more Mexicans to enter the United States illegally in search of better jobs." Mr. Speaker. I think it is time that we ask the administration who is on first and what is on second.
Keywords matched
illegal immigrants illegal immigration