I will take just 2 minutes. I am even more confused with the Senators arguments. Somehow Ph.D.s cannot be drug dealers. is that right. because if you say you support the various provisions in terms of the Ph.D.s. you have the same requirements under the visa provisions for the Ph.D.d as you have for the investors. So evidently anyone who is a Ph.D. is all right. but those investors. those investors who are going to create 10 jobs. are all going to be drug dealers. I hear another argument: "I would rather have carpenters and plumbers in here for the right reasons than Ph.D.s for the wrong reasons." Now. tell me what that means?
Identified stereotypes
Generalizing that all investors are drug dealers.