I want to wholeheartedly concur with my colleague. the gentleman form Florida . a member of the Judiciary Committee. who preceded me in this well. I want to indicate to my colleagues that while I have major differences with the content of the reported bill from the committee. my most emotionally difficult choice on the floor today was to support a motion to defeat the previous question and a motion to defeat the rule. because we do need to get our borders better under control. We do need to try to stem the tide of the chain migration that will affect us if amnesty is granted. but employer sanctions and how we deal with the question of identifying those who come here illegally are serious issues and they ought to be allowed full debate on the floor of this body. The rule. had it passed. would have denied the most basic of the demerits of the content of the bill. They could not have been debated.
Keywords matched
chain migration