Obviously. we could not let several contradictory amendments to remain in the bill as finally reported back to the House. so in those instances we have provided a kingofthemountain approach whereby the last amendment adopted in those specified instances shall be the one reported back to the House. even though the preceding amendments may have been adopted as well. I think it is important to point out those instances in which we have found it necessary to take this approach. We have done this in four instances: First. it is done with respect to amendments numbered 31 and 32. the Moorhead and Sensenbrenner amendments relating to the ceiling on nonrefugee immigration admissions. second. amendments numbered 33 and 34. the Sensenbrenner and Daub amendments limiting the fifth preference to unmarried brothers and sisters. third. amendments numbered 40 and 41 by Representatives ERLENBORN and GEORGE MILLER relating to the H2 program. and fourth. the amendments numbered 46. 47. and 48. by Representatives LUNGREN. SHAW. and WRIGHT relating to the legalization program. Mr.
Keywords matched
immigration