Session #98 · 1983–85

Speech #980164856

The former spouse would. instead. have to pursue payment through the more complex. and often substantially more expensive. garnishment procedures provided by Public Law 93647. This was not the congressional intent in Public Law 97252. and we need now to make this clear. Perhaps a specific case is the best way to show the plight of some of the former military spouses who need this bill passed. I recently received the following letter from one such woman. Let me read it. deleting names and addresses to protect her privacy: DEAR SENATOR BINGAMAN: My name is (name)-a child of the Depressionborn to poor immigrant parents. On my fathers advice and security in my future. I conformed to the regimen of being a military wife.
Keywords matched
immigrant

Classification

Target group
Sentiment
Neutral
Stereotyping
No
Confidence
80%
Model
gemini-2.0-flash
Framing
Legal / procedural Family values

Speaker & context

Speaker
JEFF BINGAMAN
Party
D
Chamber
S
State
NM
Gender
M
Date
1984-03-14
Speech ID
980164856
Paragraph
#0
← Prev Next →