India does not contain the vast oil shale deposits which are located in southern Wyoming and northern Colorado. all within a few minutes drive of the University of Wyoming. To interrupt either Dr. Inguvas research or his students course work and research by deporting Dr. Inguva would serve no purpose. There is. however. much that can be lost by the deportation of Dr. Inguva. He would lose the opportunity to continue his chosen vocation. his students would lose an enthusiastic. effective. and respected teacher. his colleagues would lose a peer who is an inspiration to them. the university. and the State of Wyoming. and this Nation would lose a dedicated researcher with a brillant mind. who is seeking ways to unlock doors which will help the United States and the world to find new energy sources to meet their growing needs. The merits compelled me to introduce S. 1569. conferring citizenship on Dr. Inguva. during the 97th Congress. Deportation proceedings were suspended to allow the Senate and House an opportunity to consider the case. The bill was considered and approved by the Senate Subcommittee on Immigration. and by the full Judiciary Committee. On April 29. 1982. the bill was approved by voice vote by the whole Senate. Subsequently. it was transmitted to the House and referred to the Judiciary Committees Subcommittee on Immigration. Refugees and International Law. After considering the case. the subcommittee voted to deny relief to Dr. Inguva. stating it was unwilling to approve private relief bills when there is any possibility that the applicant can be granted residency under INS guidelines.
Keywords matched
Refugees Immigration deporting Deportation deportation