T am natb t latuiehhdL. ruialth t- lislin. not Wn eliiekt ohlthestbjedt because I aroupnd wheH theri i o r .g be tepiflthlifll "I * " ".0..:have not been a member of tht subThelakdf .et h cle h rd 9 Lrnaddittn tb the pirbbl&s i the coIiinlttee."1 Wtki iespond". to the th6 " b VtTV f.. bill that Ive discusid.thisb btiikit~d " gentlemantioTi NeWtork. . ." However. having been a member of the Judiciary Committee for 20 years I can remember time after time that we have authorized increased surveillance of the border. our southern border. and administration after administration. including Democratic administrations and Republican administrations. have not responded to our requests. The gentleman does go to the heart of the matter. Certainly a more efficient border organization and control. plus an improved foreign policy working with Mexico and our other sister countries in Latin America. would be a much better response to the problem of undocumented workers than this bill. I would like to explain a little bit more on that in a moment as to why I disagree with the bill.
Keywords matched
undocumented