Speech #970273197

I Will Aipportamendments that adCommissions dilemma by authorizing this bill. . dress my concerns. I will offer a couple employers to relyfor the time I believe the bill accelerates the po. of my own. such as my amendment rebeingon existing identifiers and re- tential for increased violations of civil quitring the INS to secure a search quiring the Presidentwithin 3 and constitutional rights. The possible) warrant before any of its agents could yearsto implement "such changes in increase in discrimination is inherent "enter a farm or other outdoor oper. or additions to" the verification re- in various provisions of the bill.. ation withoutithe consent of the quirements "as may be necessary to es- I have. always been. and I remain. owner. : Thid amendment has bipartitablish a secure system to determine opposed .toemployer sanctibno. which san nd milltiregional support and it employment eligibility * * *." after all are the real heart. of this bill. has7 beeh my peasure working with The United States must act decisive- Putting the onus of law enf6rcement: Congrenmen DAwN M.YER and PAzio. ly to prevent illegal flowsbut also on employers is simply notappropriW among others. on it. must respond compassionately to the. ate to this problem and the"U.S. " llowVer. . must caution my colplight of those illegal aliens who have Chamber of Commerce is JustifiablY leagues that the House and the Senate acquired important equities through .opposed to this provision. In additibn.- versions of the Immigration ReforMyears of living in the United States. I believe tho employer 4anttion provi. and Control "Act are very different The Select Commission pointed the sion is discriinatory bn itg face. With bills. Even If the House version Vduld way with its unanimous recommenda- the prospect of fines pnd criminal pell-" be lmended to address6r conV"es. tion to legalize a substantial percent- alties looming over "each" employer.. we would be faced with i Senateage of the undocumented population... what epiployer would be willIng to talk. Housd conferenco In which much pf That recommendation represented a ab6ut employment to "someone Who" our work couldbelost. r recognition of the need to provide.. looks or sounds foreign or bears a for. humane treatment for persons who eigh surname? " . ... I. 2300 possess a major stake in this. country. I also remain adamantly opposed td Mr. giTA ON. Mr . Chalrman. will A mass deportation effort directed at the osslbtlity of a natlonMl ID card the Kentlmnh yield? persons who have lived among p for a for all citizeis. In addition to the pros- PAR:o Corn. yield number of years would prove seriously pect an Oi aelllarl nightmiare. this to the .ne .. ..nI disruptive of our.- national life. The would 9iniily be unworkable.