Session #93 · 1973–75

Speech #930206553

This contention is particularly significant in connection with surreptitous entries across the Mexican border. In MonarrezMonarrez v. Rosenberg. 472 F.2d 119 (9th Cir. 1972) the court rejected a contention that section 241(f) could be extended to include such surreptitious entrants. The court observed: "If petitioners reading of section 241 (f) were adopted. no alien who illegally entered this country and who was not otherwise inadmissible could be deported by reason of his illegal entry after he acquired the requisite family ties. Congress had no such alien bonanza in mind." A petition for certiorari challenging that decision was filed in CastellonDuarte v. INS. and was denied by the Supreme Court on June 11. 1972.
Keywords matched
deported

Classification

Target group
Sentiment
Negative
Stereotyping
No
Confidence
100%
Model
gemini-2.0-flash
Framing
Legal / procedural

Speaker & context

Speaker
ROMAN HRUSKA
Party
R
Chamber
S
State
NE
Gender
M
Date
Speech ID
930206553
Paragraph
#0
← Prev Next →