Session #93 · 1973–75

Speech #930162497

Chairman. at the time the votes were taken on the Vanik and Conable amendments to the Trade Reform Act of 1973. I was unavoidably absent attending a meeting at the White House. Had I been present for roll Na. 643. the Vanik amendment to deny the extension of credits to nations which deny or infringe the right to emigrate. I would have voted "aye." Had I been present for roll No. 644. the Conable amendment to strike title IV of the act. I would have voted "no." As assistant majority whip. I knew before I left the floor that my vote would not be necessary to assure the adoption of the Vanik amendment or to retain title IV of the Act. I very much support the concept of free emigration embodied in the Vanik amendment and title IV. and long ago I joined with Mr. VANIK and Mr. MILLS in sponsoring H.R. 3912. which would have accomplished the same goals.
Keywords matched
emigrate emigration

Classification

Target group
Sentiment
Positive
Stereotyping
No
Confidence
90%
Model
gemini-2.0-flash
Framing
Legal / procedural

Speaker & context

Speaker
GEORGE DANIELSON
Party
D
Chamber
H
State
CA
Gender
M
Date
Speech ID
930162497
Paragraph
#0
← Prev Next →