Session #93 · 1973–75

Speech #930160918

The amendment which will be offered by the gentleman from Ohio. which I intend to support. will be concerning withdrawal of credits. But as I understand it. the thrust of the MillsVanik proposals is that they are not to cut off the opportunity for trade. but. rather. to effect the emigration rights of Soviet Jewry. It does seem to me there is quite a difference. While the gentleman has pointed out some interesting facts about how this country has been run for the past 5 years. the fact of the matter is that if title IV stays in. with the two provisions. the sole thrust of those provisions is to make an effort to assure the rights of Soviet Jewry to emigrate from the Soviet Union. I just wondered if the gentleman is supporting title IV. as amended. or seeking to strike title IV from the bill.
Keywords matched
emigrate emigration

Classification

Target group
Sentiment
Neutral
Stereotyping
No
Confidence
100%
Model
gemini-2.0-flash
Framing
Humanitarian Legal / procedural

Speaker & context

Speaker
JAMES CORMAN
Party
D
Chamber
H
State
CA
Gender
M
Date
Speech ID
930160918
Paragraph
#0
← Prev Next →