Session #93 · 1973–75

Speech #930028414

Mr. Speaker. opponents of granting MFN treatment to the Soviet Union have based their arguments. for the most part. on the question of allowing Soviet Jews to emigrate without having to pay a discriminatory tax to do so. As a cosponsor of the Vanik bill in the House. I feel strongly that this question must be resolved as a precondition to the discussion of this issue by the Congress. I was interested. however. in an article which appeared in the Exodus. a newspaper of the Union of Councils for Soviet Jews. which appeared in the February 1973 issue. raising the question of whether or not expanded trade with the Soviet Union is in our best interests under any circumstances. considering the monetary and nonmonetary costs involved.
Keywords matched
emigrate

Classification

Target group
Sentiment
Neutral
Stereotyping
No
Confidence
95%
Model
gemini-2.0-flash
Framing
Legal / procedural

Speaker & context

Speaker
JOSEPH WAGGONNER
Party
D
Chamber
H
State
LA
Gender
M
Date
Speech ID
930028414
Paragraph
#0
← Prev Next →