Chairman. although this bill before us today is called the Foreign Military Assistance Act of 1972. it appears to me that it is something more than that in that it contains some spending categories which by no stretch of the imagination can be called. realistically. military assistance. To me. the inclusion of these matters makes this just another foreign aid billand I am. therefore. opposing it. as I have consistently opposed all foreign aid bills. The bill. for example. would authorize $100 million for refugee relief in Bangladesh. I do not question that there is a refugee problem in Bangladesh. but I do question that spending U.S. taxpayers dollars to relieve that problem can be called military assistance. In addition. the bill would authorize $2 million for war relief in Cambodia. $5 million for assistance to South Vietnamese children. and $700.000 for plastic surgery in Vietnam. Humanitarian. these expenditures may be. but I do not think they can be called. reasonably. military assistance.