1955. There have been various reasons for that. all of which have been explored by the various Attorneys General that have served during that period. the most important one being the constitutional questions that are inherent in a program of that sort. These were litigated to some extent in the Joint AntiFascist Refugee case prior to 1955. in which the due process question was raised. and efforts were made to improve the hearing procedure in the Department. But to give the type of due process hearings that a court would sustain as valid would require complete confrontation of witnesses in the course of putting in the Governments case on the organization. and any other evidence. We have no subpena power. for example. under this procedure.